An eminent psychologist explains why dissent should be cherished, not feared We''ve decided by consensus that consensus is good. In In Defense of Troublemakers, psychologist Charlan Nemeth argues that this principle is completely wrong: left unchallenged, the majority opinion is often biased, unoriginal, or false. It leads planes and markets to crash, causes juries to convict innocent people, and can quite literally make people think blue is green. In the name of comity, we embrace stupidity. We can make better decisions by embracing dissent. Dissent forces us to question the status quo, consider more information, and engage in creative decision-making. From Twelve Angry Men to Edward Snowden, lone objectors who make people question their assumptions bring groups far closer to truth--regardless of whether they are right or wrong. Essential reading for anyone who works in groups, In Defense of Troublemakers will radically change the way you think, listen, and make decisions.
Click the Download button to download a copy of the MARC file.
Enter your FTP details below to send the MARC export file via FTP.
by Marcus Buckingham, Curt Coffman
by Jim Loehr, Tony Schwartz
by Leslie Yerkes, Charles Decker
by Edwin Lefevre
by Jeff D. Opdyke
by Ken Blanchard, Jim Ballard, Fred Finch
by Marcus Buckingham
by David Magee
by Roger Dawson
by Joe Vitale, Ihaleakala Hew Len
by David Meerman Scott
by Bill George
Sign up for our email newsletter